a5c7b9f00b C.S.I. head Detective Mac Taylor and his team solve crimes in New York City.
CSI: NY is not bad. It's notgoodCSI: Miami or CSI: LV, but i guess that's because it is trying to be different. It has to be doesn't it really? What's the use in having more of the same.<br/><br/>To those who are putting it down, maybe we should give it a try. Maybe after one season you can give it a good marking. The characters still have to be developed. The NY scene seems very gritty and Sinise seems rather cold at times, emotionally detached apart from the Pilot episode where he missed his wife and went to ground zero.<br/><br/>CSI:NY over all seems worth a watch, and i will continue to watch it, i just won't expect too much out of it like i do from CSI or CSI:Miami.<br/><br/>My vote = 5/10 or 6/10 = fairly average.
I actually happen to like CSI:NY. having watched some episodes of CSI(LV)I have to say it can't quite measure up to the original, but it is definitely worth watching. Gary Sinise gives his usual great performance, although sometimes it seemsthough he's just bored with the proceedings.<br/><br/>Melina Kanakaredes (check spelling) is a good match with himStella Bonasera, and together they work through plots that work with the city,wellwith a solid supporting cast.<br/><br/>Vanessa Ferlito gives the desired amount of sex appeal mixed with street smartsAiden Burn, and Hill Harper is a wonderful balancenow-you-see-him, now-you-don't Medical Examiner Sheldon Hawkes. Eddie Cahill has the appropriate detective's attitudeDon Flack, and having seen his other work I think he has a lot of talent, plus the one-liners he has are hysterical. But in my opinion, the Staten Island-raised, smart-aleck detective Danny Messer, played to a T by Carmine Giovinazzo, is the hidden talent here. He's smart, cute, always follows the rules, but sometimes he likes to bend them for the sake of having something to do. And he's not immune to mistakes. Giovinazzo seems to take these to heart every time he appears on camera, and he is a delight to watch.<br/><br/>Maybe CSI:NY is a little young- but just give it time. I'm sureit goes by, this show will pick up and become better than it already is. What it really needs is to distinguish itself from the tangle created by CSI and CSI: Miami. Otherwise, no one will notice.

While often the science and technology portrayed in this series (as wellthe other CSI series) is accurate or mirrors sound scientific principle, there have been times when methods have led to results simply not possible in the real world. Also whilst the majority of the techniques and technologies used in the CSI franchise are accurate and true to reality, the writers and crew readily admit that they "time cheat". Tests that take seconds in the show often take days or even weeks in real life. Meanwhile the extreme popularity of the CSI TV franchise was credited for a large surge of applications for courses in forensic science, however many present day applicants are surprised to discover that the CSI's (or Crime Scene Annalists/Crime Scene Technicians, Scientific Investigators ect.) do not perform most of the tasks depicted on the CSI series. E.g. They do not interview suspects, they do not write or execute search warrants, and they do not make arrests. CSI's do not work the way the series portrays themIt would be considered an inappropriate and improbable practice to allow CSI personnel to be involved in detective workit would compromise the impartiality of scientific evidence and would be impracticably time-consuming. In real life they are directed around the scenes by the detectives and supervisors, not the other way around. Detectives are commissioned police officers (sworn personnel). CSI's are civilian personnel, not sworn and do not have the same arrest powerspolice officers. However they are very skilled technicians, and are a component of the police response to crime. American law allows for the 'false deception ploy' where the police can claim to have evidence (fingerprints, DNA, CCTV, witnesses) they do not in order to gain a confession, the idea being that any innocent person would know such evidence could not exist and see through it. This has become increasingly controversial however due to cases suchthe Central Park 5 rape case in New York where the suspects were told their co-defendants were saying they were responsible so they accused them in turn only to be exonerated years later. No, they can enter in hot pursuit, to preserve life, to prevent imminent destruction of evidence or to search for a wanted felon. They need a search warrant for evidence when those elements do not apply.
Green Lantern Corps full movie hd downloadGuardian Angels full movie in hindi free download hd 1080pKung Faux download movie freeSugrizimas in tamil pdf downloadSquadron 42 full movie downloadCode 8 movie download in hdThe Purge: Anarchy movie download hdDownload Battle Royal! full movie in hindi dubbed in Mp4Episode 1.93 in hindi download free in torrentAngels' Dance full movie download in hindi